Over the years, I’ve quietly walked away from several popular platforms—because those platforms slowly crossed a line. A line where user choice started being replaced by coercion, and convenience turned into control.
Three incidents in particular—Instagram, Google Photos, and Microsoft Clipchamp—cemented my belief that local ownership beats cloud promises every single time.
1. Instagram: When the Platform Dictates the Art
Back in 2016, Instagram only supported square photos. As someone who enjoyed landscape photography, this felt absurd. Instead of respecting the original aspect ratio, the platform forced creators to crop or compromise their work just to fit its feed.
I didn’t try to adapt my photography to Instagram’s limitations. I simply stopped caring about the platform. I moved to Flickr, where photos were treated as photos—not thumbnails for attention farming.
Instagram eventually deleted my account due to long inactivity, and honestly, I didn’t even notice. That’s how little value it was adding. A platform that forces creators to bend their work to fit an algorithm is not a platform worth staying on.
2. Google Photos: “Give Us Everything or Don’t Open at All”
I never used Google Photos for backups—not even during its so-called “unlimited free storage” phase. I always found that promise suspicious. Photos are irreplaceable memories, not data Google should get to hold hostage under changing policies.
Much later, I installed Google Photos briefly for one specific purpose: stabilizing shaky videos. It worked fine—until one update.
After updating, the app refused to even open unless I granted access to all my photos and videos. Not selected files. Not a folder. Everything.
That was the moment I smiled.
If I want to work on one video, why should I hand over my entire photo library? This wasn’t a technical necessity; it was a deliberate design choice to force broader access, deeper indexing, and tighter lock-in.
I didn’t argue. I didn’t downgrade. I uninstalled the app immediately.
Boundary crossed. Deal over.
3. Microsoft Clipchamp: Cloud Coercion Disguised as Modern Editing
Clipchamp was the fastest uninstall I’ve ever done.
I edited a video locally on my PC and tried to save it—only to find the app aggressively pushing me to save the output to OneDrive. Local save options were either hidden or intentionally made non-obvious.
This completely ignores realities like slow or unreliable internet, data caps and the simple fact that local edits should result in local files.
I verified I wasn’t missing anything obvious. I wasn’t. The app was designed to funnel users into Microsoft’s cloud whether they liked it or not. I uninstalled it on the spot and never looked back.
A video editor that doesn’t respect local workflows has already failed.
My Reaction
In all three cases, my reaction was the same: I didn’t rant online. I didn’t wait for policies to get worse. I didn’t “adjust” my habits to suit the platform.
I walked away early.
Because once a company shows you that your data, your files, or your workflow are secondary to their business model, the relationship is already broken.
And because I always kept original files on my own hardware—with multiple backups—none of these decisions ever hurt me later.
Users Are Not Company Property
There’s a dangerous mindset creeping into tech companies: Users exist to be nudged, locked in, and harvested. That mindset is wrong.
Users are not property. Their photos are not leverage. Their workflows are not funnels. Platforms should earn trust by respecting boundaries, not by quietly removing them one update at a time.

Comments
Post a Comment